The 2026 State Budget has cemented Western Australia’s position as one of the most heavily invested jurisdictions in Australia when it comes to child protection and out‑of‑home care. At the center of this push is the Roger Cook‑led Labor government’s decision to significantly boost subsidies and funding for foster care, kinship care, and related support services, as part of a broader multi‑hundred‑million‑dollar uplift in the child‑protection basket. The move is framed as both a humanitarian and a systemic reform: to keep more vulnerable children stable, reduce placements breakdowns, and strengthen the workforce that supports them. For foster and kinship carers, it means higher fortnightly rates and a clearer recognition of the cost of caring for children who have already experienced trauma, disruption, and disadvantage.

Why Foster Care Funding Needed a Lift
Western Australia’s child‑protection system has been under intense pressure for years. Demand for out‑of‑home care has risen steadily as family‑law, mental‑health, substance‑use, and housing‑stability issues intersect with the pressures of rising living costs and stretched safety‑net supports. At the same time, the number of available foster carers has not kept pace, leading to over‑reliance on high‑intensity, residential‑type placements, more movement between homes, and greater stress on children already dealing with instability.
The government’s own analysis acknowledges that the existing subsidy framework was not fully reflecting the true cost of care. The average foster‑care allowance, while providing a basic floor, did not adequately cover the extra expenses associated with schooling, transport to therapy and family contacts, extracurriculars, specialist behaviour‑support needs, and the time‑intensive supervision that many children in care require. In rural and remote areas, where carers are scarcer, the gap between the cost of care and the rate received was even wider, making it harder to recruit and retain carers outside the major cities.
The 2026 changes are designed to narrow that gap. By increasing subsidies and spreading the support more evenly across the system, the Cook government aims to make foster and kinship care more sustainable, more attractive, and less financially precarious for those who open their homes to children. The underlying logic is simple: if carers are better supported, placements are more likely to last, children are less likely to be moved frequently, and the system as a whole becomes more efficient and less crisis‑driven.
The 2026 Subsidy and Budget Boost
The 2025–26 State Budget, with measures rolling through into 2026, includes a dedicated $250 million uplift to frontline child‑protection services and out‑of‑home care, on top of the hundreds of millions already committed under the government’s multi‑year child‑protection reform agenda. Of that $250 million, a significant share is directed toward foster care and kinship‑care subsidies, with detailed increases for different age groups and care‑type categories. While the exact figures are phased and differ for metropolitan, regional, and remote areas, the overall direction is uniform: carers will receive more, more predictably, and for longer‑term placements.
The reforms also build on earlier work. Since 2023–24, the Cook government has invested more than $400 million in overhauling Western Australia’s out‑of‑home care system, including support for specialised high‑needs placements, more group and complex‑care arrangements, and a stronger push to keep children connected to country and community through Aboriginal Community Controlled Organisations. The 2026‑style subsidy increase is positioned as the next logical step in that pathway: not just expanding the number of available homes, but improving the quality and stability of those homes.
For foster‑care providers, the changes typically translate into:
- Higher base fortnightly rates for each child, with separate brackets for pre‑schoolers, primary‑school‑age, and secondary‑school‑age children, plus higher rates for teenagers and those with complex support needs.
- Increased top‑up payments for carers who take on children with disabilities or significant trauma histories, reflecting the additional time, training, and resources required.
- More consistent regional and remote‑area loading, ensuring that carers in WA’s vast interior receive compensation that reflects travel distances, access to services, and the higher cost of living in many rural towns.
These increases are not one‑off payments but embedded in the ongoing funding model, meaning that carers can budget with more confidence rather than relying on periodic top‑ups or ad hoc supplements.
Connecting the Subsidy Hike to Broader Reforms
The foster‑care subsidy boost does not sit in isolation; it is part of a wider package of child‑protection reforms being rolled out under the Cook government. In 2024, the state committed an additional $172 million to complete the transition to the new out‑of‑home care system, supporting 113 extra care arrangements, including specialised placements for young people with disabilities and additional group‑care and regional‑care options. The 2025–26 Budget added another $115.5 million largely directed at frontline child‑protection services, including $20.1 million to fund an additional 31 child‑safety practitioners, building on the 55 new positions announced in 2024.
In practical terms, the synergy is clear: more and better‑paid carers can only be effective if the system around them is also strengthened. More case workers means less caseload pressure, quicker assessments, and better support for carers dealing with challenging behaviours or complex family‑contact arrangements. The government argues that by investing in both the workforce and the financial support for carers, it can reduce the number of placement breakdowns, lower the need for emergency‑type interventions, and keep more children in stable, nurturing environments.
The focus on regional and remote placements is particularly important for Western Australia, where geography is a major constraint. By increasing foster‑care and kinship‑care subsidies in these areas, the government is trying to keep children closer to their communities, schools, and cultural connections, rather than automatically moving them into metropolitan residential care when local options are financially unsustainable.
What the Increase Means for Foster and Kinship Carers
For foster and kinship carers, the 2026 subsidy changes are intended to ease the household‑budget strain that has long been a quiet reality of caring for children in the system. Many carers are already stretched, balancing the costs of multiple school uniforms, transport to school and appointments, specialist therapies, and extracurriculars, all while receiving a flat allowance that often does not distinguish between a quiet, low‑support child and one with significant behavioural or emotional challenges.
The higher base rates mean that carers can absorb more of these unavoidable costs without dipping into personal savings or cutting back on essentials for their own families. The extra loading for complex‑needs children also helps to offset the time and effort required to coordinate with therapists, behaviour‑support agencies, and child‑protection workers, as well as the emotional toll of supporting a child through intense periods of crisis.
For prospective carers, the message is that the government is willing to put its money where its rhetoric is: if Western Australia wants more people to step forward, it must also signal that those people will be fairly compensated and properly supported. The 2026 changes are a recognition that fostering is not a charity side‑hustle; it is a high‑responsibility, high‑emotional‑load role that demands professional‑grade backing.
The Government’s Rationale and Long‑Term Goals
The Cook government’s public messaging around the 2026 foster‑care subsidy increase emphasises three main themes: stability, prevention, and workforce sustainability.
Stability comes from the idea that higher, more predictable subsidies make long‑term placements more viable. A carer who feels financially secure is less likely to withdraw from the system during difficult times, and children are less likely to be moved frequently between homes, which can be deeply destabilising and compound existing trauma. The government cites research showing that placement stability is strongly correlated with better educational outcomes, improved mental health, and stronger social connections for children in care.
Prevention is linked to the broader child‑protection strategy. By investing in foster and kinship care, the government hopes to reduce the number of children who end up in highly intensive, costly residential‑care environments or who cycle repeatedly between home and care. The cost of residential care per child is often several times higher than the cost of supporting a foster‑care placement, so the 2026 reforms can also be seen as a fiscally responsible move that redirects spending toward more sustainable, family‑based options.
Workforce sustainability ties back to the simultaneous investments in child‑protection workers and support services. If the system is to take on more children, it needs not only more carers but also more workers, training, and oversight. The 2026 budget allocates additional funds to training and support programs for carers, including respite, counselling, and peer‑support networks, which are designed to reduce burnout and improve retention. The government argues that a well‑resourced, well‑supported carer workforce is one of the most effective ways to keep children safe and out of the justice system later in life.
Challenges, Limits, and the Road Ahead
Even with the 2026 subsidy increase, the system is not without challenges. Some critics in the sector worry that the hikes, while meaningful, still do not fully cover the full cost of high‑needs care, particularly where children require multiple therapies, specialist schooling, or intensive behaviour‑support services. Others point out that increased funding does not automatically translate into more carers, especially in remote areas where the logistics and isolation can be daunting, regardless of the subsidy level.
There is also the question of how the new rates will interact with existing thresholds, such as income‑testing rules and the broader social‑security framework. Carers receiving the foster‑care allowance may still be subject to separate assessments for other government benefits, and the complexity of navigating these systems can deter some potential carers. The government’s reforms include efforts to streamline these processes, but the reality for many families is that the paperwork and compliance demands remain substantial.
Looking ahead, the 2026 foster‑care subsidy increase is likely to be reviewed and refined in light of data on placement stability, carer retention, and outcomes for children. The government has signalled that it views this as a longer‑term, multi‑year reform rather than a one‑off event, which opens the door to further adjustments if the initial increases prove insufficient or if new pressures emerge.
A Signal of Priorities
For many Western Australians, the 2026 foster‑care subsidy jump is more than a technical budget line; it is a signal of where the Cook government is choosing to place its priorities. At a time when households are feeling the squeeze of rising living costs, the decision to channel hundreds of millions of dollars into child protection underscores a political choice: that vulnerable children and the adults who care for them are worth a significant investment.
The hope is that higher, more reliable foster‑care and kinship‑care subsidies will translate into more stable homes, fewer breakdowns, and better long‑term outcomes for children who have already been through more than most adults will ever experience. If the 2026 reforms achieve even part of that ambition, they will not only change the financial reality for carers but also reshape the way Western Australia understands and values the work of keeping a child safe.

Nirti Singh is a news writer and digital content contributor at KorakoSpecklePark, covering key stories and regional developments across New Zealand and Australia. Her work focuses on clear, fact-based reporting, ensuring readers receive accurate and timely information.